chess: (trivial (Surveys/webtests/amusing junk))
http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/flash/page/0,13249,937835,00.html

Your Systemizing Quotient is 60.

51-80: You have a very high ability for analysing and exploring a system. On average women score about 24 an dmen score about 30. Three times as many people with Asperger Syndrome score in this range, compared to typical men, and almost no women score this high.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/flash/page/0,13249,937836,00.html

Your Empathising Quotient is 20.

0-32: You have a lower than average ability for understanding how people feel and responding appropriately. Most people with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism score about 20. On average, most women score about 47 and most men about 42.

Date: 2003-05-06 01:40 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] jaq.livejournal.com
SQ 52
EQ 34

I wasn't that surprised either, with either of the eithers.

Date: 2003-05-06 02:34 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] ringbark.livejournal.com
SQ 41
EQ 24

No surprises there either. This makes me an extreme S too, though not as much as Michelle.

Date: 2003-05-06 03:53 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] dr-vannacutt.livejournal.com

SQ 34
EQ 16

im rather worried byt that.

Date: 2003-05-06 04:13 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] passage.livejournal.com
SQ 44
EQ 35
Although I kept suffering an urge to check boxes that made pretty patterns on the page rather than actually related to my answers.

For the last one I was caused to think:
  • Does a person get penalised on this set of questions if they have a realistic appraisal of their ability to assess others, i.e. someone who was overconfident might score higher, not because they were more empathic, but because they had never paid enough attention to see that they weren't.
  • Does a person get penalised because they balence their intuition with reason, and would that be a fair penalisation: would weighing the intuition with reason imply the intuition was neccessarily poorer?


Intresting that your friends list seem to tend towards your extreme scores Michelle (unless of course their averages are way out, which is always possible).

Date: 2003-05-06 06:21 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] sagima.livejournal.com
SQ=31
EQ=21

I have a extreme type S brain then

my scores

Date: 2003-05-06 09:43 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] adamosity.livejournal.com
SQ=46

EQ=16

any surprise I have Asperger's? *grin*

Date: 2003-05-06 09:43 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] ahsu.livejournal.com
EQ = 16
SQ = 42

I found the empathy test frustrating, since I've been discovering in the last, oh, ten years that I simply miss observing a lot of things that I feel strongly about. I would, for instance, not assume that it's the responsibility of a stranger in a group to integrate themselves, but I function so awkwardly in groups that I might literally not notice a stranger -- I often don't. So I didn't know how to answer those questions. I know how I feel, but I don't know how I function, kwim? Besides, people with bpd often have trouble interpreting non-verbal signals, too.

Date: 2003-05-06 11:47 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] pling.livejournal.com
SQ=56
EQ=30

And yeah, like everyone else, not surprised.

Date: 2003-05-12 05:28 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] phamster.livejournal.com
EQ: 20
SQ: 46

Fairly Bleh... hmmm, funny, was thinking about this sort of thing the other day. I'm dsylexic... but recently I've been wondering if something else was missed in the process... oh well... still another useful LJ post, i'm so glad I read over the old ones... thanks Chess.

A confuzzled phamster...

Profile

chess: (Default)
Michelle Taylor

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 1st, 2026 04:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios