Very nice but a little beyound me. You do realise that he first link you put there gives only this
"Nope, don't have one of those."
Ive done the smallest amount of proramming you can do in c and found it very stress full. I liked it in the good old days of basic. i could get my hed round the simple bits of that. i could do alot with basic excluding grafix and file handleing. But good old DOS batch programing was the best for me. My 486DX2 66 played the x files theam when it booted up on the pc speaker ;-)
And sorry chess that this has once again moved away from your topic. If i knew how to work (marnanel)'s LJ then i would prolly talk about this there.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: Hmmmm
Date: 2003-02-19 06:42 am (UTC)From:Very nice but a little beyound me. You do realise that he first link you put there gives only this
"Nope, don't have one of those."
Ive done the smallest amount of proramming you can do in c and found it very stress full. I liked it in the good old days of basic. i could get my hed round the simple bits of that. i could do alot with basic excluding grafix and file handleing. But good old DOS batch programing was the best for me. My 486DX2 66 played the x files theam when it booted up on the pc speaker ;-)
And sorry chess that this has once again moved away from your topic. If i knew how to work (marnanel)'s LJ then i would prolly talk about this there.