Romans 1 do you?
"25They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator--who is forever praised. Amen.
26Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones."

I'm not sure I follow Naath's arguement actually: even if it didn't specifically mention women would it make any sense to think it somehow didn't apply to them?

Isn't that just pedantry?

The bible isn't a scientific paper, it's not carefully derived from axioms so that pedantry is the appropriate way to approach it.

This isn't a docuement written to be read by computers, but by humans, so read it like a human.

If the text doesn't say something but it's blindly obvious it means it, then go with that meaning.

The bible never once mentions Jesus using the toilet. I think we can be entirely confident that Jesus had a digestive system that threw ought waste just the same as yours does.

Neil
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

chess: (Default)
Michelle Taylor

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 6th, 2026 04:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios